Do forum profiles help?

I'm not sure about the answer, so I'm going to set a link up to a couple and see if the get indexed. theres one here http://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showuser=47893 and another one here http://forums.techguy.org/members/614043-steve_gts.html so I can see if once they are indexed I can find them in my webmaster tools, I'll do an update once I have a definitive answer.

BT are at it now too

BT are probably the largest company ever to begin to sell S.E.O and Pay per click services. Their S.E.O packages include almost all of the things you would expect to get with a basic S.E.O pack, with the option one for £74.99 a month + a £100 setup charge you get : * Keyword selection * All-embracing web site audit * Suggestions document * In depth phone consultation * Unlimited e-mail access to online promoting experts * Google Site Map production and provision for upload * Monthly S.E.O reports position reporting * Best practice S.E.O paperwork & guides the single thing that is missing is link building, however links are discussed in their option 2 package which costs £349.99 every month + £100 set-up : * all of the features of Option one and : * Unlimited 0800 phone-based support * Link building thru three bespoke articles ( monthly ) * Index submissions to up to fifty focused directories * Augmented reporting * Boosted reporting of keywords & rival link research That doesn't sound too bad, it might go either way I think dependent on the standard of the articles they're making and the standard of the web directories and article directory sites they're submitting to. For an analogous price we are going to include submissions to all the best paid directories like BOTW and Yahoo and so on.

If they're just submitting to the free ones then there is less likelihood of your links getting authorized and sticking around.

SEO Devizes

Search site Optimization or S.E.O is a mixture of different online marketing systems to boost your business internet sites search site Positioning. A selection of enterprises in Devizes rely on us for their search website Optimization and online marketing System . We use a selection of moral techniques including : * Keyword discovery and research * On-Page search site Optimization and content idea * Competitor site research * Link building campaigns and management * Email selling * Ongoing monitoring and fine tuning to keep positioning A successful promotional campaign must be based on understanding your purchasers. We do not target to attempt to teach you info that you might already know, we simply wish to invoke your inspiration and get you thinking more like your clients. A good web marketing package will pay for itself and get traffic into your site and boost your sales activities. For seo devizes there is only one choice so give us a call.

We can help you to reach your patrons and offer you the auto to ramp up sales. If you want more traffic thru your site and need assistance, or use our make contact with us form. About Devizes Situated in the heart of the Wiltshire countryside, Devizes is a significant market city with a colorful medieval past.

The town enjoys a rich heritage of fine Georgian homes and a 19th century castle built on the location of a Norman stronghold. Devizes has boasted a castle for one thousand years, though the present building is of a rather more up to date period and is privately held. In the Middle Ages it was actually the scene of siege and carnage as Queen Matilda fought to keep her English crown. If you'd like additional information click now.

Mayday Update

Often a Google algorithm change is important enough that even those that don't spend lots of time targeting the procedures notice it. That looks to be the case with what those debating it at Web designer World have named Mayday.

Last week at Google I / O, I was on a panel with Googler Matt Cutts who announced, when asked during QA, this is an algorithmic change in Google, attempting to find better quality sites to surface for long tail questions. It went thru powerful testing and isn't going to be rolled back. I asked Google for more specifics and they said to me that it was a rankings change, not a crawling or indexing change, which appears to suggest that sites getting less traffic still have their pages indexed, but some of those pages are now not ranking as highly as before. Based mostly on Matt's comment, this change impacts long tail traffic, which typically is from longer questions that few folks search for individually, but in aggregate can supply a major percentage of traffic. This change appears to have basically impacted very big sites with item pages that do not have many individual links into them, might be a couple of clicks from the index page, and may not have significant unique and value-added content on them. As an example, ecommerce sites frequently have this structure. The individual product pages are not very likely to attract external links and the great majority of the content may be brought in from a manufacturer database. Naturally, as with any change that ends in a traffic hit for some sites, other sites experience the opposite. Based totally on Matt's comment at Google I / O, the pages that are now ranking satisfactorily for these long tail questions are from better quality sites ( or maybe are better quality pages ). My complete rumination is that maybe the importance routines have been changed a bit. Before, pages that did not have top quality signals might still rank well if they'd high significance signals. And maybe now, those high significance signals do not have as much weight in ranking if the page does not have the right quality signals. What's a site controller to do? It can be hard to create pressing content and attract links to these sorts of pages. My best suggestion to people who have been hit by this is to isolate a group of questions that the site now is getting less traffic and take a look at the search results to see what pages are ranking instead. What qualities have they got which make them seen as valuable? For example, I haven't any way to know how amazon.com has fared in this update, but they have done a reasonably good job of making individual item pages with copied content from manufacturer's databases unique and animating by the addition of content like of user reviews.

They have set up a reasonably tough internal linking ( and anchor text ) structure with stuff like advocated items and lists. And they attract external links with features eg the my favourites widget.

Optimising a Blog

Get Your Blog Listed by main search engines Add Your Blog to Yahoo and Submit your Sitemap Getting listed in the top search engines is a must if you'd like to get traffic from search sites. I wrote a couple of in depth articles about the way to add a sitemap to main search engines and the way to add your blog to Google, Yahoo and MSN so I won't repeat myself.

Follow these articles for step-by-step walkthroughs Optimise Your Blogger Post Titles big search engines lend lots of weight to titles so it's really important that you craft your post titles meticulously. To optimise your post titles make them keyphrase heavy and make sure the title obviously explains what the blog post is about.

Try and put your keywords at the start of your title for most satisfactory results and avoid repeating your keywords in the title.

Avoid long titles as Google only displays about sixty five characters in the search results anyhow. Title tags are vital if your Blogger blog is to draw in traffic and rank in search website results. On your blog home page the blog title appears between the title tags while on every individual post page it's the name of the draft itself. While the title tags themselves are unseen by the visitor to your blog they're read when search websites crawl your blog. Search websites use title tags to display your post title as a title in search site results. Search websites also display an outline of the tract either by removing it from the post content generally by picking up the 1st 150 characters of your post or by reading the meta outline of the post if one exists. Meta outlines can be made for individual posts in Blogger to good effect. Make outlines unique for each post and guarantee they contain your target keywords and key phrases to inspire search engines to extract pieces from them. To learn more about adding a meta outline to an individual post please see my article Adding Meta Tags to Blogger Blogspot Blog for Better S.E.O .

pay per click

Traditionally , the mind-set of the 2 separate approaches of Pay per click & S.E.O have not necessarily been exactly the same. For instance, when targeting high volume ( frequently universal ) search phrases PPC marketing experts would approach with caution instantly thinking about return. What are the average CPCs of the keywords, margins or KPIs of the client? Does the site have a strong or wide enough variety of products or services to achieve an adequate conversion rate to gain a satisfactory level of return on the spend? How has it performed in the past? What are the average conversion rates? For example.

From an S.E.O viewpoint there would be some caution, but some of the more instant thoughts were always Is achieving first page rankings achievable? Where are they ranking now? What's their present link profile like? How many days work every month will it need for link building to achieve this? So maybe already far less concentration on real KPIs. The price tag is rather detached, so maybe liability aswell. But times have moved on. What I like about PPC is it's transparency and successive responsibility it holds. With a high level of precision you can see precisely what you are spending, where it has been spent and the successive effect on conversion and eventually return. Clients expect to see a positive return. They can see precisely what's working, what's wasting them money and how much they're getting in turn. What struck me instantly when I started in S.E.O years back was the difference in expectancies and responsibility.

Agencies did not provide far more than ranking reports as a measure of performance. Clients did not always expect much more either. This is reasonably an extraordinary thing from a Pay-per-click point of view. Imagine running a campaign without tracking or delivering a keyword report with just cost and rank. While not totally the same, is it that different? With no regard for the search selling discipline ( Pay per click / S.E.O ), clients are paying cash to gain concluded business targets, which should really be based primarily on discernible business KPIs.

Skyrocketing visibility ( rank ) is the core method to reach these objectives, but isn't the end target. So it shouldn't be the final judge of performance either. In the past I've seen serious rankings and successive high visitor volume but very low conversion accomplished by S.E.O judged as a success and therefore the low conversion was a failure of the site / business instead of the campaign. Something that would just never wash in the world of PPC.

Glaringly sites are in part responsible and search marketing pros can't all be conversion rate mavens, but the first method and implementation for targeting is totally down to the supplier.

There's less control in S.E.O , but the accountability for targeting and reaching ROI should be the same.

SEO has moved on

Things have moved on.
Nowadays, web masters are likely to work with the search websites, as Adwords and Adsense.
GoogleGuy is now the non-mysterious Matt Cutts, who helpfully asserts indexing changes before they occur, even if he is still rather imprecise on detail. Sadly , the collective "us " - web masters - don't share the same level of friendship we once did. As search selling is now above radar, competition levels have become aggressive. Usually website owners reverse-engineer competing sites.
Who is linking to them? What pages are linked? How old are the links? What keyword terms are they targeting? What are their preferred keywords? What Adwords are they running? What meta keyword tags are they using"? ; ) great questions - aside from the last one, manifestly - and a valid system for emulating high ranking sites. Tools like SEMRush provide a useful bit of knowledge into what our competition are doing. BTW : Not pimping, I have been using SEMRush a lot latterly, and I suspect it is a great tool : ) nonetheless there's more to it. We also must look at some other, non-technical factors that reveal something much more profitable and fascinating. Competitive research Competitive intelligence is a continuing, methodical research of our competition.
The objective of a rival analysis is to develop a profile of the character of methodology changes each rival might make, each competitor's possible reaction to the range of likely strategic moves other firms could make, and each competitor's likely reaction to industry changes and environmental shifts that might happen. Competitive intelligence ought to have a single-minded objective -- to develop the secrets and strategies important to transfer share of the market gainfully and regularly from precise rivals to the company. The necessary query underlying competitive research is this : "why do some web companies do far better than others? " vis search, we not only need to take a look at the technical facets of the sites positioned above us, but we also must analyse the markets in which they exist, what our competition goals are, their pricing and products, and even obscure details ,eg who they may be hiring and firing, and why. As can clearly be seen, it's not only about getting listed higher for a certain keyword term. It's about getting listed higher vis overall business performance. It's about seeing what market they capture, and where that market is heading in the future.
Once you have worked out that, you could be able to discover new keyword streams that the competition have missed, and may never think about. Ok, so how? Ways to Do Competitive research it might be nice if you might call up your competition and ask them precisely what they are doing, and where they're heading. But everyone knows that is not going to occur. We have got to do a little investigative digging. The issue is we don't really wish to do too much digging, as it is long and can be expensive. Fortunately, lots of the answers we need are sitting in front of us. Ask these questions : * what's the nature of competition? * Where does the rival compete? * Who does the rival compete against? * How does the competitor compete? The character of the contest is the market, and market forces. Have a look at Google Trends, trendwatching sites and other market analysis tools to work out where their market is now, and where it heading. Does the market need major resources? Why are these rivals in these markets? What related markets have they evaded, and why? A concrete example. 1 or 2 years back, many SEOs competed as service agencies. Market trends showed clearly that a lot of SEO was moving in-house, particularly at the top end. As S.E.O moved in-house, demand rose for coaching. Lots of SEOs are now engaged in coaching. Ask where your market will be in 5 years time. Where does the rival compete?For example, are they limited to a certain geography? Culture? Language? Have they got an offline presence? Who does the rival compete against? Create a list of the, say, top 10 competitors in a spot.
Compare and contrast their approaches and offerings. Compare their use of language and their relative place in the market. Who is entrenched? Who is up-and-coming? Who has got the most share of the market, and why? Are you able to grab some of this share?